Which of the following can act to revive a dormant judgment?

A dormant judgment is one that has not been enforced or executed in a specific period, rendering it inactive or inactive in terms of recovering the owed amount. To revive such a judgment, certain actions must be taken to reactivate the ability to enforce it.

Bringing an action within the specified time frame is essential because jurisdictions typically set a statute of limitations for enforcing judgments. If the judgment creditor acts within this specified time frame, they can renew or revive the judgment, allowing them to pursue collection actions again. This action is crucial as it demonstrates the creditor's intent to enforce the judgment, which is a key requirement for reviving a dormant judgment.

Other options, while potentially relevant in different contexts, do not specifically address the process of reviving a dormant judgment. For example, a new execution might initiate enforcement, but without the context of it being within a permissible time frame, it does not inherently revive an inactive judgment. A change in ownership does not affect the validity or enforceability of a judgment. Similarly, a motion to the court might be part of the process but does not itself guarantee that a dormant judgment is revived unless it is accompanied by actions within the appropriate time limits.