Which doctrine has not been adopted by Ohio?

The Accommodation Doctrine is associated with the rights of a surface owner to utilize their property while allowing for the reasonable use of subsurface resources, such as oil or gas. This doctrine requires that the actions of the subsurface rights holder should not unreasonably interfere with the surface owner's enjoyment of their land. However, Ohio has not adopted this doctrine, which means the state does not impose the same requirements for balancing the interests of both the surface and subsurface rights holders as some other jurisdictions do.

In Ohio, property law typically leans towards recognizing the dominant rights of the mineral rights owner without the same specific accommodations for surface owners' interests that the Accommodation Doctrine would provide. This lack of adoption may reflect a more traditional approach to property rights, focusing more on the strong entitlement to extract resources.

Other doctrines like the Surface Rights Doctrine, Ownership Doctrine, and Fair Use Doctrine have different implications and applications that Ohio may include in its legal framework, focusing on surface ownership and the rights associated with property use.