In addition to annual compliance reviews, how else can CPLTA license holders demonstrate adherence to standards?

Participating in peer review processes is a key method for CPLTA license holders to demonstrate their adherence to established standards beyond annual compliance reviews. Engaging in peer reviews not only facilitates a collaborative environment where professionals can assess each other's practices and outcomes, but it also helps to ensure that practitioners are applying the best known methods and staying current with evolving regulations and standards. This type of evaluation can highlight strengths and areas for improvement, fostering professional development and accountability within the field.

In contrast, the other options do not effectively contribute to demonstrating compliance or adherence to standards. Avoiding new regulations can result in stagnation and potential non-compliance with necessary updates in standards. Conducting unregulated activities could jeopardize a license holder's ability to maintain their certification by engaging in practices that might be unethical or outside professional boundaries. Focusing solely on specialties might limit the scope of a license holder’s knowledge and ability to adapt to cross-disciplinary standards that are increasingly recognized as beneficial in practice.